Original articles : AIDS. 21 Suppl 4:S47-S53, July 2007
Rajasekaran, Sikhamani; Jeyaseelan,
Lakshmanan; Vijila, Sundaraj; Gomathi, Chandrahasan;
Raja, Krishnaraj
Abstract
Objectives: To study the incidence
and risk factors for failure of treatment with antiretroviral therapy
among adults in the national treatment program in India, and to
estimate the possible number of persons living with human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV) who will need a second-line treatment
regimen in the next 3 and 3.5 years.
Design and setting: Data of a cohort of
HIV-positive adult patients, who were enrolled in the
government-sponsored antiretroviral therapy program, were obtained from
the electronic medical record system of the largest HIV care center in
India and subjected to analysis.
Main outcomes: Treatment failure
defined by the World Health Organization criteria, assessed
immunologically on the basis of CD4 T cell count, with a minimum period
of 12 months of follow-up and with a minimum of two CD4 T cell
follow-up measures.
Results: The cumulative incidence
of treatment failure in the 1370 adult patients included in the study
was 3.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.9 to 4.9). Men had a 3.5 (1.6
to 7.4) times significantly greater risk of treatment failure. Patients
who had negative changes in absolute lymphocyte count, hemoglobin
concentration and body weight had 3.1 (1.6 to 6.2), 3.2 (1.6 to 6.2),
and 3.5 (1.9 to 6.4) times significantly greater risk of treatment
failure. In India, after 2007, by 2, 3, and 3.5 years, respectively, an
estimated 16 000, 35 000, and 51 000 patients receiving antiretroviral
therapy are likely to require second-line treatment.
Conclusion: Monitoring of hemoglobin
concentration, absolute lymphocyte count, and body weight during
follow-up emerged as inexpensive predictors of treatment failure in a
resource-poor setting. A significant number of patients will need
second-line therapy as a result of failure of their first-line
antiretroviral therapy regimen in 3 and 3.5 years in India, and
therefore the development of an appropriate policy for second-line
drugs is urgently needed.
(C) 2007 Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins, Inc.